The Hall of Shame: 3-Strikes Caused by Politicians who Follow the Mob (or Even Incite It)

"Distrust all men whose impulse to punish is powerful." Friedrich Nietzsche

Like the spineless judges, prosecutors and politicians in the days of the witch trials, today's politicians find it easier to jump on the bandwagon than necessarily to "do the right thing."

Where would today's judges, prosecutors and politicians have been in Nazi Germany, Stalinist USSR, at the My Lai massacre in Vietnam, or as the Ku Klux Klan lynched African-Americans? Would they have stood up against the mob, or would they have joined it?

This is another page the politicians are going to hate. When history looks back at this time, how will they be judged? This page is going to stay up for many years so people can see who stood up and who didn't against the 3-Strikes law.

One thing the politicians haven't reckoned with is that a web page can be created and stay up for many years. No longer can politicians hope that their past votes and comments will be hidden from the public because newspapers and the media will have forgotten about them. In the future, if someone wants to do a search on the internet for a particular politician, hopefully this page will pop up and they can see what a politician stood for in the past.

The following are some comments made by politicians and their voting records regarding the 3-Strikes law. PLEASE SEND US NEW COMMENTS AND ARTICLES IF YOU HAVE THEM.

Attorney General Dan Lungren and Governor Pete Wilson hold mantel for greatest mob inciters

District Attorney in Colusa County follows the crowd--no matter what.

San Diego District Attorney against 3-Strikes but then admits to easily joining the mob

Political consultant makes living having mob turn against politicians that don't join it

Politicians who voted for AB 971.

Politicians who voted against SB2048

Politicians who voted against SB1317

Politicians who voted against AB1444

Politicians who voted against SB2089

Prison guard union incites the mob, and now regrets it


Attorney General Dan Lungren and Governor Pete Wilson hold mantel for greatest mob inciters

FACTS gives the mantel for the politicians who have incited and inflamed the mob the most to Attorney General Dan Lungren and Governor Pete Wilson. Is it any coincidence that Dan Lungren is planning to run for the Governor position and Pete Wilson is planning to run for President?

Dan Lungren shows the true depth of his ability to misconstrue the 3-Strikes law for his political purposes through his article "Three Cheers for Three Strikes." (FACTS response can be found by clicking here.)

Pete Wilson has shown the depths of his sleaze by going to the funeral of Polly Klaas and angering the relatives of Klaas (click here for story).


District Attorney in Colusa County follows the crowd--no matter what.

"I come from a really conservative county. They want people locked up, and locked up forever. I want to keep my job. If prior strikes are serious or violent, I don't care what the current charge is. I want him locked up." -- John R. Poyner, Colusa County district attorney, quoted in California Lawyer, October 1996.


San Diego District Attorney against 3-Strikes but then admits to easily joining the mob

While campaigning for district attorney in San Diego County in 1994, Paul J. Pfingst opposed the version of the law that was enacted that year. Instead, he supported an alternate proposal under which a third strike would have to involve a violent felony. The prosecutor later pointed out that voters elected him only to quickly disregard his first piece of legal advice by approving a broader three strikes initiative.

Since his election, however, Pfingst has become a strong 3-Strikes advocate. He worked with local superior court officials and public defenders to set up the state's first courtrooms devoted solely to 3-Strikes cases, staffing them with a nine-member prosecution force. He also joined Attorney General Dan Lungren in arguing the Romero case before the state Supreme Court and has loudly lamented the court's opinion in that case, which provided judges with wider discretion in three strike trials. California Lawyer, October 1996, by Marty Graham.


Political consultant makes living having mob turn against politicians that don't join it

Dave Gilliard, a leading political consultant in California, is the chief political adviser to Orange County Republicans and has been gathering ammunition he hopes he can use to torpedo Democrats over the 3-Strikes debate.

"Lockyer really set his feet in concrete over the whole thing," said Gilliard, referring to the Hayward lawmaker's role in scuttling the GOP's 3-Strikes measure to remove the bulk of judicial discretion to strike priors. "Three strikes has incredible support. I think he made a political mistake on this one."

Gilliard is the perfect example of someone that gets the mob to turn against anyone who tries to stop it--and he gets paid by the mob for doing it. How does it feel to have sold your soul Dave?

California Lawyer, October 1996, by Mike Lewis


Politicians who voted for AB 971.

Here they are, they may have been afraid to stand in front of the 3-Strikes train at the time, but now they look pretty bad in their decision-making. Here are the politicians that voted "yea" to the 3-Strikes law in March of 1994.

The California Senators that voted "yea" were as follows:

Ayala, Bergeson, Beverly, Boatwright, Calderon, Craven, Dills, Greene, Hill, Hurtt, Johannessen, Kelley, Leonard, Leslie, Lewis, Lockyer, Maddy, McCorquodale, Mello, Peace, Presley, Roberti, Rogers, Rosenthal, Russell, Thompson, Torres, Wright, and Wyman

The California Assembly members that voted "yea" were as follows:

Aguiar, Alby, Allen, Alpert, Andal, Areias, Baca, Boland, Bornstein, Bowen, Bowler, Bronshvag, Valerie Brown, Brulte, Bustamante, Caldera, Connolly, Conroy, Cortese, Costa, Eastin, Epple, Escutia, Ferguson, Frazee, Goldsmith, Gotch, Hannigan, Harvey, Hauser, Haynes, Hoge, Honeycutt, Horcher, Johnson, Jones, Karnette, Katz, Klehs, Knight, Knowles, Margolin, Martinez, McPherson, Moore, Morrow, Mountjoy, Napolitano, Nolan, O'Connell, Polanco, Pringle, Quackenbush, Rainey, Richter, Seastrand, Snyder, Solis, Statham, Takasugi, Umberg, Weggeland, and Woodruff


Politicians who voted against SB2048

SB2048 made it out of the Public Safety Committee on April 14, 1998.  The vote was as follows:

Noes:

Rainey,  McPherson and Schiff

Ayes:

Vasconcellos, Burton, Kopp, Polanco and Watson


Politicians who voted against SB1317

Here they are, the senate members that are still willing to allow nonviolent and non-serious offenders to get a "25 years-to-life" sentence from the vote in 1997:

Alpert (D), Bruite (R), Calderon (D), Costa (D), Dills (D), Haynes (R), Hurtt (R), Johannessen (R), Johnson (R), Karnette (D), Kelley (R), Knight (R), Leslie (R), Lewis (R), Lockyer (D), Maddy (R), McPherson (R), Monteith (R), Mountjoy (R), O'Connell (D), Peace (D), Rainey (R), Schiff (D), Thompson (D), Wright (R)

Those who voted yes:

Burton (D), Greene (D),  Hayden (D),  Hughes (D), Johnston (D), Kopp (I),   Lee (D), Polanco (D), Rosenthal (D), Sher (D), Solis (D), Vasconcellos (D), and Watson (D).

Absent, Abstaining, or not voting:

Ayala and Craven


Politicians who voted against AB1444

Here they are, the assembly members of the Assembly Public Safety Committee that voted against AB1444 from getting out of the committee which would have narrowed the 3-Strikes law to only violent and serious offenses:

Boland, Bowler, Goldsmith, Rainey and Rogan

Those who voted in favor of amending the law were as follows:

Villaraigosa, Kuehl, Martinez, and Kevin Murray


Politicians who voted against SB2089

Here they are, the senate members who voted against SB2089 which would have narrowed the 3-Strikes law to only violent and serious offenses in 1995:

Ayala, Beverly, Calderon, Costa, Dills, Haynes, Johannessen, Johnson, Kelley, Leonard, Leslie, Lewis, Lockyer, Maddy, Monteith, Mountjoy, Peace, Rogers, Thompson and Wright

Those who voted in favor of amending the law were as follows:

Alquist, Boatwright, Greene, Hughes, Johnston, Killea, Kopp, Marks, Mello, Petris, Polanco, Rosenthal, Solis and Watson

Absent, abstaining or not voting:

Craven, Hayden, Hurtt, O'Connell, Russell and Sher

 


Prison guard union incites the mob, and now regrets it

The California Correctional Peace Officers Association spent vast amounts of money on politicians that support the 3-Strikes law and even gave over $100,000 to the group that spearheaded the successful 1994 ballot measure that ratified the Legislature's earlier enactment of the tough 3-Strikes sentencing law. (Click here for more details).

Now, apparently worried about the fact that assaults on prison guards have nearly doubled since judges began handing down stiffer prison sentences in response to the 3-Strikes law, Don Novey, head of the CCPOA, seems to have changed his mind. Currently Novey says the law "has to have fairness to it," and has called for earlier parole for nonviolent offenders, while restricting third strike offenses to serious or violent crimes. California Lawyer, October 1996, by John Roemer.

Unfortunately, Novey's voice on this matter is now only a little squeak, and we haven't seen any money being contributed to politicians and groups that support amending the law to do just what he says.


Return to Index.

Please send questions or comments to factsla@sbcglobal.net.

Everything on this web site can be distributed to the general public, reprinted, or reposted without permission of Families to Amend California's 3-Strikes.

Date last modified: 5/2/98.