3-Strike Stories: E. Heine

To whom it may concern:

I'm writing this letter about the 3-strikes law here in California. It seems to me that this law benefits the politicians more than it does the people of California.

I would like to know, where is the justice in giving a human being 25 years to life for a non-violent, non-serious felony. Our politicians say the crime rate has gone down. If that's the case, why is our governor, Pete Wilson, always asking for more money to build more prisons?

Im 30 years old and I'm doing 26 years to life under the three-strikes law. I was accused of manufacturing a controlled substance in 1996 and found guilty in 1997. I'm now sitting here in Susanville state prison doing 26 years to life. I'm not eligible for parole until the year 2023 at the earliest. Under the three-strike law, you do one hundred percent of the time you were given.

It was my understanding that the three-strike law was brought into effect to keep people like Richard Allen Davis off the streets... the rapists and child molesters. Instead, it's taken the people that have committed non violent, non serious felonies off the streets.

When you're in prison under the three-strike law you lose a lot of contact with your family. The contact you get is a 15 minute phone call, and visits for a few hours at a time. That's if your family lives close enough to visit.

I thought the whole idea of prison was to rehabilitate a person, and get them ready to become a productive member of society. The way prisons are now, they are overcrowd and have no form of rehabilitation. So when a person is released, all they know is the same way of life.

The only thing a prison is, is a human warehouse, where every day you are slowly dying, not just physically, but also mentally. I see the crime problem in this country as a stepping stone for the politicians. Look at how much is spent on prisons. There is no end to the spending.

I admit that I've made some mistakes in life, but I'm not a career criminal. I'm a loving, caring father and son. I feel that your family should come before anything else.

personally, I don't see the justice in sending someone to prison for so long for making a mistake, and going down the wrong path; do you?

The politicians will say once a criminal, always a criminal. That we should be locked up under the three strike law because there's a chance we will commit another crime. Isn't there a good chance that we could be rehabilitated and become a productive member of the community? Someone that would be proud of ourselves, and for our families and community to be proud of?

Under the three-strike law we're not given a chance; you're more or less condemned to life in prison for making a mistake. There's a saying: "let the time fit the crime." Not here in California. Here, it's lock them up for 25 years to life and forget about them, because there's a chance they will do something wrong again. What's the chance of coming out of prison 25 years from now, and being a productive person?

I don't know if any one cares enough to read this, and to do something to change the way the state of California throw people away. There is still a lot of good in some of us. Before you condemn us to die in prison, just think if could be you or someone you know and love, sitting here for making a mistake.

So think about that before you let the politicians throw away the key!


Return to Index.

Please send questions or comments to facts@mediaone.net.

Everything on this web site can be distributed to the general public, reprinted, or reposted without permission of Families to Amend California's 3-Strikes.

Date last modified: 6/3/98.